| Alright, I've wanted to
do this for a long time, and it has nothing to do with sex
(sex with me, at least), so if it's sex you want, go back
to this part of the site: Phone Mia.
I'm a total pop culture
junkie, and not in any condescending "oh, look what
the little people are amusing themselves with now"
sort of way. I *am* one of the little people. I own a
Britney CD.
Added
March 25: Oscar Coverage
WARNING/MANIFESTO:
I am fairly ruthless,
unkind and arbitrary when it comes to talking about books,
movies, art, celebrities etc. If you think ruthlessness is
not nice and might ruin your warm fuzzy day, perhaps you
should go back to the warm fuzzy part of the site: WarmFuzzyMia.
I'm very interested in, and
fascinated by, pop culture. I don't really see a lot of
evidence of a 'high' culture in North America that isn't
accessed by only a very tiny segment of society, so in a
way pop culture *is* our culture. J.Lo has had a much
bigger effect on society than, say, Phillip Roth. I just
don't buy the notion that pop culture isn't worthy of
thought or study. We're surrounded by it almost 24/7.
There should be some engagement, some discussion, at least
some basic questioning, don't you think? I usually have a
copy of US magazine in my backpack next to my 1000 lb.
Milton text, and I don't see anything wrong or incongruous
about that. So if you're going to continue reading this
stuff, keep yer fool mind open, OK?
I also believe that putting
a 'product/work' (song, movie, person etc.) in the public
domain is a risk, in that it is then open not only to
adoration but to criticism as well. I know this probably
goes without saying, but I am constantly shocked by how
many people want to live in a nice world where everything
is pleasant and mediocre and...nice and no one says
anything too scathing or mean about anything. This kind of
ties in with my frustration at famous people who complain
about how intrusive the media is, how scrutinized they are
etc. It's not as if there isn't a pay-off for them -
immense wealth for one. The publics' interest in famous
people is fuelled by publicity, and as far as I'm
concerned, if you're going to take (and encourage) the
good by putting yourself out there in the public eye, then
you should be tough enough to take the bad as well. It's
pretty clear these days that being a big star leads to a
LOT of scrutiny, and I have noticed that none of the
younger stars made the decision not to star in their first
blockbuster, or wear that slip of cloth for a dress. They
are *aware* of what comes with fame - everyone is these
days. If you choose to take steps to become famous, then
you also choose to take the consequences of your fame,
good or bad.
CELEBRITIES:
Who sucks, who doesn't...all according to Mia.
MOVIES:
Reviews, recommendations...movies, books, ads.
AD
CAMPAIGNS: The
good, the bad and the really fucking painful. Added Feb 1,
2002
BOOKS:
Those things with words in them.
POP CULTURE DISCUSSIONS:
More in-depth analysis of current articles, campaigns etc.
Jan
30: A shiny new rant just for you! "These People are
Boring!" -
Wandering discussion on Cameron Diaz, beauty, fame and
worth.
Dec
8:
On George Clooney - Discussion
of George Clooney's activism, Hollywood types and the
media in general.
1-877-754-7922
|